<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Liquid Viral</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liquidviral.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liquidviral.com</link>
	<description>all things web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:05:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;If facebook were a bloke, it would have been punched in the face by now&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://liquidviral.com/facebook/if-facebook-were-a-bloke-it-would-have-been-punched-in-the-face-by-now?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=if-facebook-were-a-bloke-it-would-have-been-punched-in-the-face-by-now</link>
		<comments>http://liquidviral.com/facebook/if-facebook-were-a-bloke-it-would-have-been-punched-in-the-face-by-now#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Liquid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liquidviral.com/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So said one of my friends recently and I have to admit, I feel the same. There&#8217;s been a growing realisation for me recently and I&#8217;m growing out of love with facebook. I&#8217;m pretty sure the Time Line is the final straw. My use of it peaked in 2011, but since Christmas I&#8217;ve been updating [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="http://liquidviral.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/facebook-icon.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-167" title="facebook-icon" src="http://liquidviral.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/facebook-icon.jpg" alt="" width="210" height="210" /></a>So said one of my friends recently and I have to admit, I feel the same.<br />
There&#8217;s been a growing realisation for me recently and I&#8217;m growing out of love with facebook. I&#8217;m pretty sure the Time Line is the final straw.<br />
My use of it peaked in 2011, but since Christmas I&#8217;ve been updating and checking it less and less with each passing day.</p>
<p>The reasons seem to be two fold&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-164"></span> (1) I&#8217;ve pretty much sick of the updates from my &#8220;friends&#8221; some of whom I&#8217;ve not really seen or spoken to in years.</p>
<p>(2) The Apps</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the Apps that are really getting to me. Each time I sign up for a new &#8220;thing&#8221; on the internet, I can link it to my facebook profile. Handy if I want to post my Instagram pics to my FB page, or want to see who else has liked the restaurant I&#8217;m currently in. But each time I see that &#8220;Allow&#8221; box and see exactly what I&#8217;m granting this app access to, I&#8217;m more and more nervous.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m sure these people have my best interests at heart&#8230;</p>
<p>But at the same time, do I really want to effectively allow some unknown person / company to be able to see my updates and to update my status on my behalf?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care what my friends are watching on Netflix and I&#8217;m pretty sure they&#8217;re not interested in seeing that I&#8217;ve been watching the entire back catalogue of The Inbetweeners.</p>
<p>All these constant updates, status updates, &#8220;liked&#8221; page updates, <em>all</em> this clutter really detracts from what I liked about facebook originally.</p>
<p>With the IPO hot in the news, there&#8217;s been some talk of what facebook needs to look out for. Competition wise, it&#8217;s not a hard one to workout.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re wanting to create a facebook killer, simply reinvent facebook and take away all the apps.</p>
<p>Recreate the &#8220;Social&#8221; network it once was and sit back and watch people flock to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liquidviral.com/facebook/if-facebook-were-a-bloke-it-would-have-been-punched-in-the-face-by-now/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clear App iOS &#8211; Coming Soon!</title>
		<link>http://liquidviral.com/apple/clear-app-ios-coming-soon?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=clear-app-ios-coming-soon</link>
		<comments>http://liquidviral.com/apple/clear-app-ios-coming-soon#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Liquid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS Apps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liquidviral.com/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To do lists on the iPhone are a little hit or miss. I really liked the Reminders app, especially with the location based function. But in actuality when you come to use it, it&#8217;s clunky. I&#8217;v never been able to get it to remind me fill the car up next time I&#8217;m near the garage. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-157" title="Clear App iOS" src="http://liquidviral.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/clearapp.jpg" alt="" width="209" height="208" /></p>
<p>To do lists on the iPhone are a little hit or miss.</p>
<p>I really liked the Reminders app, especially with the location based function.</p>
<p>But in actuality when you come to use it, it&#8217;s clunky. I&#8217;v never been able to get it to remind me fill the car up next time I&#8217;m near the garage.</p>
<p>So, that aside, I&#8217;m really intrigued to see this little app on the horizon, <a title="Realmac Software Clear App" href="http://www.realmacsoftware.com/clear/">Clear</a>.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s not a lot to know at the moment. Developed by <a title="Reamac Software - Clear App" href="http://www.realmacsoftware.com/clear/">Realmac Software</a>, their website has a snazzy video showing the app working.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s bright, clear and looks very easy to use. But it&#8217;s that pinching move the guy does, that&#8217;s what&#8217;s sold it to me. What a great way of moving between the menus.</p>
<p>Hoping to see this released soon, so fingers crossed. In the meantime, fire over to the <a title="Realmac Software Clear App" href="http://www.realmacsoftware.com/clear/">site</a> and see it for yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liquidviral.com/apple/clear-app-ios-coming-soon/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SpotOn App for iOS &amp; Spotify</title>
		<link>http://liquidviral.com/apple/spoton-app-for-ios-spotify?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=spoton-app-for-ios-spotify</link>
		<comments>http://liquidviral.com/apple/spoton-app-for-ios-spotify#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Liquid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOS Apps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liquidviral.com/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember when we used to get Pandora in the UK? That was great wasn&#8217;t it? Before Spotify came along, it was THE answer to the boring old Radio 1 play list. However, the powers that be, came along and took away all our fun. But now, thanks to the Spotify API, we are now beginning [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="http://liquidviral.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/spoton.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-149" title="Spot On App" src="http://liquidviral.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/spoton-203x300.jpg" alt="" width="203" height="300" /></a>Remember when we used to get Pandora in the UK?<br />
That was great wasn&#8217;t it?<br />
Before Spotify came along, it was THE answer to the boring old Radio 1 play list.<br />
However, the powers that be, came along and took away all our fun.</p>
<p>But now, thanks to the Spotify API, we are now beginning to see some interesting apps coming through.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The first of these to grab my attention is <a title="SpotOn App on iTunes" href="http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=spoton%20app&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;sqi=2&amp;ved=0CDcQFjAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fitunes.apple.com%2Fgb%2Fapp%2Fspoton-radio%2Fid471762418%3Fmt%3D8&amp;ei=L70qT6GJMof28gPtg6H3Dg&amp;usg=AFQjCNFGW4AAEtUhn1wKL7gzkzmCOOOWzg&amp;sig2=23hCL-egEPWD4B1WlR4HOw">SpotOn</a>. It&#8217;s basically Pandora, using the Spotify back catalogue.</p>
<p>Not only that, but it looks really great too.<br />
Free, so check it out and let me know what you think.<br />
I&#8217;ve not used it masses yet but the interface is simple and it&#8217;s choices of music are pretty good, Spot On if you will.<br />
One thing missing is AirPlay. Any movie or music app now HAS to come with Airplay compatibility built in. Not doing so is plain lazy.<br />
Lets hope it appears in a not too distant update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liquidviral.com/apple/spoton-app-for-ios-spotify/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick post about Launch Centre iOS App</title>
		<link>http://liquidviral.com/apple/quick-post-about-launch-centre?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=quick-post-about-launch-centre</link>
		<comments>http://liquidviral.com/apple/quick-post-about-launch-centre#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Liquid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liquidviral.com/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a lot of apps on my iPhone and try to wrangle them into some sort of order using the folders. It&#8217;s fine as it works but there&#8217;s some things that I use all the time and constantly forget where I&#8217;ve put them. The problem is increased now that I have the iPad as, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="http://liquidviral.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/iphone_launchcenter.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-142" title="iphone_launchcenter" src="http://liquidviral.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/iphone_launchcenter-135x300.jpg" alt="" width="135" height="300" /></a>I have a lot of apps on my iPhone and try to wrangle them into some sort of order using the folders.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s fine as it works but there&#8217;s some things that I use all the time and constantly forget where I&#8217;ve put them. The problem is increased now that I have the iPad as, although I have roughly the same apps on each machine, they are not always in the same sounding folders.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s where Launch Centre comes in.</p>
<p>Like most other users, I&#8217;m sure I have a loosely based &#8220;ranking&#8221; system for my iOS apps.</p>
<p>1st screen, all the important stuff, 2nd screen the second place stuff, but the dock, well, that&#8217;s for the super special apps! Calendar, Safari, Phone, Messages etc</p>
<p>Well, Launch Centre has just been included into that line up. Praise indeed!</p>
<p>Before watching the interview on <a title="Cult of Mac" href="http://www.cultofmac.com/142837/hands-on-with-the-uber-useful-launch-center-an-automator-for-ios-macworld-2012/">Cult of Mac</a> I had no idea that <a title="iOS URL Shortcuts" href="http://applookup.com/">iOS url shortcuts</a> existed.</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m looking for them all over the place!</p>
<p>Seriously, if you&#8217;ve looking for a great way to manage links to apps, speed dials / quick messages, then this app is perfect for you.</p>
<p><a title="Launch Centre" href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/launch-center-flashlight-shortcuts/id488626436?ls=1&amp;mt=8">Check it out, 69p well spent!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liquidviral.com/apple/quick-post-about-launch-centre/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sonos Fun for Everyone &#8211; Sonos and Airplay</title>
		<link>http://liquidviral.com/apple/sonos-fun-for-everyone-sonos-and-airplay?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sonos-fun-for-everyone-sonos-and-airplay</link>
		<comments>http://liquidviral.com/apple/sonos-fun-for-everyone-sonos-and-airplay#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Liquid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liquidviral.com/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got one of these for Christmas, I know I know, I&#8217;ve been a very good boy this year. I wasn&#8217;t expecting it, to be honest, although I was vaguely aware of them, I wasn&#8217;t really too sure what all the fuss was about. I mean, I have Airplay at home, isn&#8217;t it just like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><img class="size-medium wp-image-138 alignleft" title="Sonos" src="http://liquidviral.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/home_banner2-300x288.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="288" /></p>
<p>I got one of these for Christmas, I know I know, I&#8217;ve been a very good boy this year. I wasn&#8217;t expecting it, to be honest, although I was vaguely aware of them, I wasn&#8217;t really too sure what all the fuss was about. I mean, I have Airplay at home, isn&#8217;t it just like that? Well, after playing with it every day since, I have to say I started off not understanding it, now I wonder how I ever lived without it.</p>
<p><span id="more-137"></span>For those of you not in the know, Sonos is a wireless speaker system at it&#8217;s most basic and a full on internet streaming service at it&#8217;s best. Setup is simple, really simple, like Apple simple. Out the box, you plug in the Bridge to your router, plug in the speakers to your power supply, run the software and 5 mins later, you&#8217;re up and running. Suddenly Spotify has been reborn. iTunes has a new lease of life, and then you get to internet Radio etc.</p>
<p>The iPhone and iPad both have free apps built for Sonos and they could not be easier to use. Linking speakers together for that &#8220;through the house&#8221; sound, or playing different streams to different rooms, are a few easy clicks away. And you can forget about having to use the computer to control it, or even have it turned on, as once you have your iSomething hooked up, everything runs from that. Just you and the speakers.</p>
<p>Configuring the system to access your iTunes was a synch, as was setting up Spotify &amp; Last FM etc.</p>
<p>But as I like to tinker with things, I got wondering about Airplay.</p>
<p>I had a spare Apple Airport kicking about and knew the Play 5 had a line in at that back. So I did a bit of scouting about and found you can hook it up quite happily.</p>
<p>The only draw back to the Airplay support is that it feels a little bolted on, a little bit like an afterthought. While it works well enough, it&#8217;s not quite as slick as the rest of the system.</p>
<p>That being said, in no way does it detract from a great experience over all.</p>
<p>Finally, as I like to watch movies and I like to stream them from the iPad while doing so, I wanted to know if it was possible to stream the movie soundtrack through the Sonos using Airplay.</p>
<p>Short answer is yes. But this is the only area that it falls down on. The syncing of the Airplay movie and the soundtrack is out, by at least 4 &#8211; 7 seconds depending on what your playing.</p>
<p>I think part of the reason is a lag behind the signal from Airplay and it being processed by Sonos, and also that Sonos syncs the signal to other speakers. There it must buffer the information coming in, adding further to the lag.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used CineXPlayer and Good Player and they both have the same issue. You maybe able to get round it if you could delay the movie and the soundtrack and get them to match that way, but after even more reading, the only software I could find that could do that was VLC. But that app has been pulled and I&#8217;m not even sure if the app was able to do, or if it was just the Mac version.</p>
<p>Otherwise, I could not recommend this system more. The quality of the sound is astounding as is the build and the software. At the time if writing this, there were a couple of offers kicking about for the Play 3, Play 5 and the bridge all together in one package. If you have a bit of extra Christmas money burning a hole in your pocket, and you like listing to your music on a quality system, you could do a LOT worse.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liquidviral.com/apple/sonos-fun-for-everyone-sonos-and-airplay/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So you&#8217;ve been banned by Adsense</title>
		<link>http://liquidviral.com/uncategorized/133?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=133</link>
		<comments>http://liquidviral.com/uncategorized/133#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Liquid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liquidviral.com/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you&#8217;ve had your Google Adsense account banned? We in that case you&#8217;ll fall into one of the following 3 categories: (1) Your site has suffered from a sudden spike in traffic and Google has deemed it as fraudulent activity (2) Someone, known or unknown to you, has been causing fraudulent clicks on your website. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>So you&#8217;ve had your Google Adsense account banned?<br />
We in that case you&#8217;ll fall into one of the following 3 categories:</p>
<p><span id="more-133"></span></p>
<p>(1)	Your site has suffered from a sudden spike in traffic and Google has deemed it as fraudulent activity</p>
<p>(2)	Someone, known or unknown to you, has been causing fraudulent clicks on your website. Google has noticed this and blocked your account</p>
<p>(3)	Finally, and lets be honest here, you&#8217;ve have been clicking on your own ads. It&#8217;s a temptation, I know, but you really should have been more careful.</p>
<p>The first indication you&#8217;ll get that something is wrong will be when you try and login to your Adsense account and you can&#8217;t, or when you get the following email known as a Google Adsense Account Suspension Notification</p>
<p>&#8220;It has come to our attention that invalid clicks have been generated on the Google ads on your site(s). We have therefore disabled your Google Adsense account.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you fall into either category 2 or 3, then I&#8217;m afraid it could be bad news.</p>
<p>Category 1 &#038; 2</p>
<p>If you have genuinely been hit by a malicious attack and your account has been suspended then you could have a case for appeal with Google.</p>
<p>How to appeal to Google</p>
<p>Now this can be a tricky one but barewith me. In order to have the best chance of getting your Adsense account reinstated you will need to email<br />
adsense-adclicks@google.com</p>
<p>In your email make sure you contain the following information:</p>
<p>o	Your name</p>
<p>o	Your company&#8217;s name (if applicable)</p>
<p>o	Your publisher ID number (located in the AdSense code on your website with the format: &#8216;pub-################&#8217;)</p>
<p>o	Your website&#8217;s URL</p>
<p>o	Date your account was disabled</p>
<p>o	Your website&#8217;s audience</p>
<p>o	The source of your website&#8217;s content</p>
<p>o	Frequency of content updates</p>
<p>o	The primary sources of your website&#8217;s traffic</p>
<p>o	The number of people involved with the administration of the site</p>
<p>o	Any relevant information that you believe would explain the invalid click activity we detected.</p>
<p>Remember to include as much detail as possible and ensure you mention that you&#8217;ve now taken steps to prevent this type of attack from occurring again. For example, if you believe that a particular person, or a certain IP address has targeted you, ban this address from your site.</p>
<p>Plead your case stating where and when you think these fraudulent clicks came from. Include logs of site traffic to show trends and also mention if there is any particular reason as to why your site may have suddenly rocketed up in hits when you usually have a steady daily click through.</p>
<p>Some reasons for sites suddenly having a huge number of hits maybe down to being included in a link from another site; being mentioned on TV / Radio, or running a successful ad campaign. You will be able to strengthen your case with evidence if you include facts and figures from the campaign to prove the increase in traffic to your site.</p>
<p>As with any appeal, there is no guarantee that you will have your account reinstated or be allowed to set up a new one.</p>
<p>Category 3</p>
<p>If you have been clicking on your own ads and been caught, it is highly likely that you will never be able to reinstate your current Google AdSense account or open a new one. Just accept that fact now and move on. Seriously, that&#8217;s it, give it up, it&#8217;s over! I&#8217;ve never EVER met or heard from someone that has had their account reinstated after being found guilty of fraudulent clicks on their own site.</p>
<p>If you have had no luck in your appeal or you fall into category 3 the only way you would be able to get Google Adsense back is to reapply for a new account.</p>
<p>You will have to register for a completely new site with a new name and new banking details. Plus, you will not be able to use the same machine / Internet IP connection with which you accessed your original account. Google will know and your new account will also be banned. If you do manage to go ahead and get a family member, friend, dog to sign up for you, Google will ban you the second they suspect that your pulling a fast one. Don&#8217;t forget, clicking on your own ads or getting others to do it, is illegal.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s really all you can do. Be honest with yourself, if you&#8217;ve knowingly tried to con the system, then you don&#8217;t deserve to be part of Google Adsense.</p>
<p>If however, you feel that you do have a genuine case for appeal. Best of luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liquidviral.com/uncategorized/133/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Great iPhoto Sync Project!</title>
		<link>http://liquidviral.com/apple/the-great-iphoto-sync-project?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-great-iphoto-sync-project</link>
		<comments>http://liquidviral.com/apple/the-great-iphoto-sync-project#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Liquid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liquidviral.com/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have three macs (7 if you could phones and iPads, mine and the Mrs.). An old G4, an old macbook and a new iMac at work. Boasting eh! And we have two kids and a dog. So you add all that together you get a SHIT LOAD of digital pictures. Originally I had a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>I have three macs (7 if you could phones and iPads, mine and the Mrs.). An old G4, an old macbook and a new iMac at work. Boasting eh!</p>
<p>And we have two kids and a dog. So you add all that together you get a SHIT LOAD of digital pictures.</p>
<p>Originally I had a single iPhone library on my macbook. Then I got a Time Capsule and for want of saving space, I moved my library over there. Reason being that I&#8217;d only really be using iPhoto when I was at home.</p>
<p><span id="more-129"></span></p>
<p>That worked well enough, until I decided to hack the G4 and upgrade it to run OSX. Now it could run iPhoto too.</p>
<p>So I could share the library between the two machines. So far so good. Then Apple updated everything and suddenly iPhoto needed updated too, so without thinking about it, I upgraded my iPhoto library from the macbook and suddenly it wasn&#8217;t accessible from the G4 anymore.</p>
<p>Now, bare with me, we use the G4 in the kitchen as a Spotify machine. Recently they announced that Spotify will no longer support my old G4, no matter what OS I&#8217;ve managed to hack onto it. Therefore, I&#8217;m going to finally replace it with a mac mini. The upshot is, I&#8217;ll be able to start syncing my iPhoto&#8217;s between the machines again.</p>
<p>Second part of this is, I&#8217;ve also recently started paying for Dropbox. So now I have a lovely disk in the sky, I can save things too. And my reasoning is, that my work machine, and two home machines, can now all be pointed to the same Dropbox iPhoto library.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty easy to do ( I think) but it&#8217;s given me a baseline from which I really should take full advantage and finally get round to that job I&#8217;ve been putting off for years. I&#8217;m going to &#8220;sort&#8221; my digital photo album!</p>
<p>This means I have at least 10,000 pics to go through. Delete the crap and only hang onto the good ones. So I&#8217;m going to do it like this.</p>
<p>Export everything from both iPhoto libraries. Combine in with all iPhoto Photosync backups and import into a brand new iPhoto library on Dropbox. Then I&#8217;ll run Duplicate Annihilator to remove the copies, leaving me with a ton of images to sort though and clean.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the plan anyway, I&#8217;ll let you know how I get on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liquidviral.com/apple/the-great-iphoto-sync-project/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iOS 5 beta 7 bricks 3GS &#8211; UPDATE</title>
		<link>http://liquidviral.com/apple/ios-5-beta-7-bricks-3gs?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ios-5-beta-7-bricks-3gs</link>
		<comments>http://liquidviral.com/apple/ios-5-beta-7-bricks-3gs#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 08:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Liquid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liquidviral.com/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just tried the iOS beta 7 update OTA on my 3GS. It&#8217;s bricked it and according to a Google search, I&#8217;m not the only one. Trying to restore to the full download from the developers site to see if that works. Need to use iTunes and the phone in DFU mode to do this. To [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Just tried the iOS beta 7 update OTA on my 3GS.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s bricked it and according to a Google search, I&#8217;m not the only one.</p>
<p>Trying to restore to the full download from the developers site to see if that works.</p>
<p>Need to use iTunes and the phone in DFU mode to do this.</p>
<p>To save you looking, cos I couldn&#8217;t remember how either, Open iTunes &#8211; Connect phone using USB, hold down the Home and the Power button for 10 seconds, release the power button but keep hold of the Home button. iTunes will eventually say that a phone has been found in recovery mode etc etc. Download the new update and install from there.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll let you know how I get on.</p>
<p>UPDATE &#8211; OK that worked. Beta 7 now in place, even managed to restore my phone form the iCloud backup from last night, so I&#8217;ve not lost anything. Well done Apple, just need to get those OTA updates nailed.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liquidviral.com/apple/ios-5-beta-7-bricks-3gs/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foscam FI8918W &amp; Sky Router Diamonds and Question Marks</title>
		<link>http://liquidviral.com/google/foscam-fi8918w-sky-router-diamonds-and-question-marks?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=foscam-fi8918w-sky-router-diamonds-and-question-marks</link>
		<comments>http://liquidviral.com/google/foscam-fi8918w-sky-router-diamonds-and-question-marks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 10:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Liquid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liquidviral.com/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not really viral / marketing or in anyway related to the usual posts on this site but as I couldn&#8217;t find a fix no matter how hard a Googled, I thought I&#8217;d post up a quicky on here to see if I can help out any other fellow strugglers. &#160; &#160; The issue was quite [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="http://liquidviral.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Foscam-FI8918W.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-114" style="border-width: 10px; border-color: white; border-style: solid;" title="Foscam FI8918W" src="http://liquidviral.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Foscam-FI8918W.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></a>Not really viral / marketing or in anyway related to the usual posts on this site but as I couldn&#8217;t find a fix no matter how hard a Googled, I thought I&#8217;d post up a quicky on here to see if I can help out any other fellow strugglers.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
The issue was quite simple, I bough the camera above. Set it up wired on my network and all worked fine. Set it up for wireless access and the whole thing spat the dummy.</p>
<p>Quick fix for this is two fold.</p>
<p><span id="more-107"></span></p>
<p>(1) You have to know that the camera has two MAC IDs and therefore it&#8217;s got two IP addressees. The first when it&#8217;s connected locally, the second for when it&#8217;s connected wirelessly.</p>
<p>So for example, if you plug the camera into the router and it tells you it&#8217;s got the IP of 192.168.0.5, then connect up up for wireless access, chances are it&#8217;s now got the IP address of 192.168.0.6</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t mention this in the manual</p>
<p>The second part, the bit I was stumped on was that when I connected the camera wirelessly, the router could see it&#8217;s mac ID ok but the IP address in the &#8216;Attached Devices&#8217; list was only showing up as a series of diamonds and question marks.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t have a clue what that meant. It also meant that the camera wasn&#8217;t connecting correctly to the wireless and therefore I was unable to use it unless it was locally wired. Sort of defeating the purpose!</p>
<p>Long and already dull story short, my router was configured to only allow certain IP addresses to connect. I don&#8217;t remember setting this up but I must have done as it was all local devices like the Apple Time Capsule etc.</p>
<p>All I had to do was go to Setup &#8211; Wireless Settings &#8211; Wireless Station Access List and turn Access Control Off.</p>
<p>Once this was done I refreshed the Attached Device listing and sure enough the camera was there with it&#8217;s new wireless IP address.</p>
<p>I included this IP back in the Wireless Station Access list, turned the Access Control back on and that was it!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s worth pointing out that I also swapped the camera from DHCP to a the static IP once the router has assigned one. That way I&#8217;ll not get any probs should I switch the camera off and move it&#8217;s position etc.</p>
<p>Once that was done the rest was plain sailing. In fact I&#8217;ve gone ahead and ordered a second one.</p>
<p>Hope someone out there finds this useful as I couldn&#8217;t find any reference to a Sky Router not recognising a wireless device, instead only showing the diamonds and question marks. This, by the way, indicated an encrypted IP address, that&#8217;s what made me think to check the WSAL in the first place!</p>
<p>By the way if you&#8217;re thinking about getting the Foscam FI8918W, I highly recommend it. £60 ish off Amazon. The image quality is pretty good. The FTP / Mailing of images collected from the Motion Detection are a doodle to setup and very sensitive. Plus the Infrared camera is really great. It even works well for outside access over my horrible slow internet connection ( I live in the sticks!). All in, I can&#8217;t see how you can get much better for the price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liquidviral.com/google/foscam-fi8918w-sky-router-diamonds-and-question-marks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Girls on one side &#8211; Boys on the other. Google+ vs Facebook</title>
		<link>http://liquidviral.com/google/girls-on-one-side-boys-on-the-other-google-vs-facebook?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=girls-on-one-side-boys-on-the-other-google-vs-facebook</link>
		<comments>http://liquidviral.com/google/girls-on-one-side-boys-on-the-other-google-vs-facebook#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Liquid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liquidviral.com/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google+ vs Facebook &#8211; fast forward a year. Will the men have left Facebook in their droves and set up a new Lord of the Flies style existence on island Google+? Short answer, no. The real question is how soon before businesses turn from Facebook and move more into Google? That&#8217;s the only yard stick [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://liquidviral.com/google/girls-on-one-side-boys-on-the-other-google-vs-facebook" title="Permanent link to Girls on one side &#8211; Boys on the other. Google+ vs Facebook"><img class="post_image aligncenter frame" src="http://liquidviral.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/googleplus2.jpg" width="404" height="299" alt="Post image for Girls on one side &#8211; Boys on the other. Google+ vs Facebook" /></a>
</p><p>Google+ vs Facebook &#8211; fast forward a year.</p>
<p>Will the men have left Facebook in their droves and set up a new Lord of the Flies style existence on island Google+?</p>
<p>Short answer, no.</p>
<p>The real question is how soon before businesses turn from Facebook and move more into Google?<br />
That&#8217;s the only yard stick to judge the success of this new social channel.</p>
<p><span id="more-87"></span>Google+ has circles allowing you to selectively choose who sees your updates, while still allowing you to accept friend requests from people you may not want on Facebook. Suddenly you have the &#8220;work&#8221; friends group, the &#8220;real&#8221; friends group etc etc. In short, Granny no longer needs to see pics of you throwing up at the weekend, but can see that lovely pic of you holding a puppy at the church fete.</p>
<p>Woo Hoo! Everyone&#8217;s a winner.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s worth remembering that Plus is still in beta. Once the fully fledged product is released, expect to see a huge influx of men and women signing up.</p>
<p>So who is going to win?</p>
<p>To answer that you have to be able to answer the following -</p>
<p>(1) Will Google create a product attractive enough to get people to jump ship from Facebook? In my opinion, they have done. Expect to see &#8220;Google+ like&#8221; circles / groups in Facebook real soon.<br />
Google+ is also better looking &amp; less application heavy (at the moment) than Facebook. The whole Google interface is cleaner and slicker than FB.</p>
<p>(2) Whoever has the best app for smart phones will win &#8211; I rarely check my FB account on anything but my phone / ipad. The iPhone FB app is good but they have yet to release an iPad version and currently the iPhone one is buggy as hell in iOS 5. A Google+ app is already working it&#8217;s way through the App store as we speak.</p>
<p><strong>Verdict</strong> &#8211;  Facebook&#8217;s shot itself in the foot with the horrendous privacy rules &amp; the lax control over applications leads to a overall amateurish look and feel. Added to that their slow updates and total lack of support for the iPad means that they&#8217;ve left the door wide open for someone to come in and steal their crown. Facebook have become complacent while Google+ on the other hand, is the new kid on the block with cool trainers and slick banter.</p>
<p>Nobody is going to be able to call this one at the moment, but I will go out on a limb and say, to quite Highlander &#8211; THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE!<br />
For one very simple reason &#8211; Will you run two social media accounts with effectively the exact same content?</p>
<p>No, thought not&#8230;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liquidviral.com/google/girls-on-one-side-boys-on-the-other-google-vs-facebook/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 635/758 objects using disk: basic

Served from: liquidviral.com @ 2012-02-08 19:56:09 -->
